Skip to main content

The Nuclear SHam


*OMar Abdullah, The young and Handsome Mp
of the national conference, gave one of the most passionate and best speeches in the parliament on Tuesday.But my point is, he said he will vote with the government because of the Babri Masjid case,
2002 Gujarat riots and the amarnath yatra.
I tried my level best to connect all this with Nuclear energy and its debate but failed.
ALso he voted along with his arch rival the PDP
True, he stood by some convictions of his, but i expect more intelligence from an intelligent and young MP.

* When Vajpayee was the prime minister, I remember, a scam broke out.It was the petrol pump allotment scam.SOmething like that.Our prime minister stands up in the parliament,cancels all allotments, and makes a clear call on the issue,immediately.
Our new prime Minister, Mr egoistic Singh as i refer to him, when saw the bundles of notes being waded around, at least could have stood up and said.
"I will get the matter investigated deep.In the best possible manner."
But he is mr ego. He couldn't say it.My question is, would he have lost a lot if he would have given an assurance to the country immediately.WHo is guilty or not guilty is a secondary issue.

* IN there defense, Amar SIngh calling the MPs as prostitutes of democracy or whatever he was calling, referring again and again to bed and who slept with whom. It was filthy.You say you are a social worker.A social worker doesn't use such language in front of the national Media.
Ahmed Patel, defended himself well.WIth full dignity he addressed the media, and said he is ready to face any inquiries.

* The prime minister is so eager for the nuclear deal,that he never took parliament into confidence for such a crucial pact.Only when his government was in minority he came to the parliament with bought Mps.
On the other hand, The deal will only get passed when the united stated congress passes it.
I think its India which is more democratic country, then why our egoistic PM behaved in such a fashion, when he knew there was a lot of opposition to the deal.Why was he evasive all the time.

Comments

Also read

Cutting people off isn’t strength—It is a trauma response

Your ability to cut people off and self-isolate is not a skill you should be proud of—It is a trauma response Cutting people off and self-isolating may feel like a protective shield, but it is often rooted in unresolved or unhealed trauma and an inability to depend on others. While these behaviors seem like self-preservation, they end up reinforcing isolation and blocking meaningful connections. Confronting these patterns, seeking therapy, and nurturing supportive relationships can help break this unhealthy cycle. Plus, a simple act like planting a jasmine plant can symbolise the start of your journey towards emotional healing. Why do we cut people off and isolate? If you’re someone who prides themselves on “cutting people off” or keeping a tight circle, you might believe it’s a skill—a way to protect yourself from betrayal, hurt, or unnecessary drama. I get it. I’ve been there, too. But here’s the thing: this ability to isolate yourself is not as empowering as it may seem. In fact, i...

Trail of Mohammad Ajmal Amir Kasab – A joke!

Who do you trial? Who does this? What is this all about? Is this playing with justice or is it just a mockery of the whole thing? Well, there are lots of questions and I find very less of answers to all these. Mohammad Ajmal Amir Kasab is the only survivor from the pack of Pakistani terrorists who attacked Mumbai on November 26, 2008 (better known as 26/11). He was captured while he was on a rampage killing scores of people and injuring hundreds, on that dreadful night in Mumbai. There was a lot of fuss in the last few months about him being a Pakistani or his age to be prosecuted in an adult court or with his captivity. Recently, the long awaited trial started and everyone is waiting to see what the court will decide on his fate. Ridiculous! What is there to decide? Hang him!! Simple… Well, I do not want to hang him without getting all the information from him and only after proving that the attackers were all from Pakistan and the whole incident was built up by the Pakistani Army, Go...

Dumb Indians?

Some more thought on EDUCATION. This was originally written by me on my personal blog... but i think this will go very well in this arena too. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The fundamental issue that India has and not easily solvable is average IQ being low. India's average IQ is 81, while that of most progressed countries is above 97. China surprisingly has an average IQ of 100. India being a truely democratic country, the government is represented by majority, and majority has an IQ below 70 (IQ distribution is vast in India). Hence you get a government elected by morons, representing morons, and full of morons. And since these morons govern justice system, education system, healthcare, you name it, a person with an engineering degree, or a doctor, or a lawyer from India on average has an IQ of 81 as well. While the requirements of bec...