Skip to main content

A Book Review: Cheaper by the Dozen


Reading was a habit inculcated in me from a very young age. Not only were my parents encouraging, but my sister was an avid reader herself, and she introduced me to some of the most wonderful books. On my 14th birthday, she gave me a book called Cheaper by the Dozen. It had a picture of some kids in a buggy on the front, and the following summary on the back :

'The reason why Dad had so many children - there were twelve of them - was that he was convinced anything he and Mother teamed up on was sure to be a success...'

I took it up the next day, and was hooked in under five minutes. Since then, I have read this book countless times. And even though I know the entire narrative now, I still split my sides at the outrageously funny incidents outlined here.

Dad, Frank Bunker Gilbreth and Mother, Lillian Moller Gilbreth raised twelve children over seventeen years before Dad passed away in 1924. Both Dad and Mother were pioneers of time and motion study, and they believed that any process that works in a factory should work in the house and vice-versa.The Gilbreth home was a picture of efficiency and regimentation, with charts to monitor brushing of teeth, taking baths, height, weight and with each older child being in charge of a younger child. Dad was a born teacher, and the book tells us of many of his innovative and interesting teaching techniques. Dad would frequently use the line: 'Do my Irishmen come cheaper by the dozen?' (Hence the Title). Dad had the knack of looking at a person and guessing his nationality. He would then substitute the appropriate nationality into his question.
Each incident brings to light new sides of Dad and Mother. Dad was the planner, the motion-study expert, and Mother was the psychologist, the one who settled all the fights. Dad was a natural teacher and Mother was a natural story teller. The book is dedicated:

'To DAD, who only reared twelve children, and To MOTHER, who reared twelve only children'.

Cheaper by the Dozen is an enchanting window into childhood, a story of order in terrific chaos, often transporting us back to our own childhood, and often making us wish that we too were a part of this big rambling family. Personally, this is easily among the Top 5 books I have ever read. I find myself laughing along with it, and a feeling on contentment steals over me. I strongly recommend this book to all book-lovers, to all parents, and to anyone who wants a good laugh and some cheering up! Cheaper by the Dozen was followed up by 'Belles on Their Toes', which continued the Gilbreth family saga. This is what I'm gifting myself on my birthday this year. So many years after I first read Cheaper by the Dozen, I'm eagerly awaiting another round of Gilbreth family fun!

Comments

shrutiwrites said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
shrutiwrites said…
I've read Cheaper by the Dozen and I fully agree with the feedback of the book given here. I enjoyed reading the book a lot and asked my younger sis also to read as she is not much into reading and belongs to the lot which gives a nasty look as soon as they hear the word 'novel'. But this book had the power to keep her hooked to itself and she had got too much involved in the book that when Dad dies, she had tears in her eyes!!

Popular posts from this blog

Cutting people off isn’t strength—It is a trauma response

Your ability to cut people off and self-isolate is not a skill you should be proud of—It is a trauma response Cutting people off and self-isolating may feel like a protective shield, but it is often rooted in unresolved or unhealed trauma and an inability to depend on others. While these behaviors seem like self-preservation, they end up reinforcing isolation and blocking meaningful connections. Confronting these patterns, seeking therapy, and nurturing supportive relationships can help break this unhealthy cycle. Plus, a simple act like planting a jasmine plant can symbolise the start of your journey towards emotional healing. Why do we cut people off and isolate? If you’re someone who prides themselves on “cutting people off” or keeping a tight circle, you might believe it’s a skill—a way to protect yourself from betrayal, hurt, or unnecessary drama. I get it. I’ve been there, too. But here’s the thing: this ability to isolate yourself is not as empowering as it may seem. In fact, i...

Epitome of Equality

First of all This is not to demean any religion.. I am a Hindu by birth, but yes I respect all religions .I offer my daily prayers , fast on holy days , but there was something that was disturbing me . God as per me was a Friend, someone who was by my side always , someone who was a dear friend , but this is not what everyone else thought , for others he was the Judge who gives his verdict always and punishes anyone and everyone . Walk into any temple and you would see , if you have money , you will be treated in a way as if you are the ONLY disciple of the God . I have had too many experiences where I was treated as a second class citizen in the temple . Why? Well I could not afford giving thousands as donation. This is not how it should be , God looks at each one of us with the same divinity .As I mentioned God for me is a friend, so tell me, do we chose friends based on their bank balances? Do we give our verdict on them ? then how can God do it? I know many of us would ...

Does India need communal parties?

I think, it was Tan's post on this blog itself, Republic Day Event, where this question was raised. My answer. YES. we need communal parties even in Independent, Secular India. Now let me take you, back to events before 1947. When India was a colony of the British Empire. The congress party, in its attempt to gain momentum for the independence movement, heavily used Hinduism, an example of which is the famous Ganesh Utsav held in Mumbai every year. Who complains? No one. But at that time, due to various policies of the congress, Muslims started feeling alienated. Jinnah, in these times, got stubborn over the need of Pakistan and he did find a lot of supporters. Congress, up till late 1940's never got bothered by it. And why should we? Who complains? No one. But there were repercussions. The way people were butchered and slaughtered during that brief time when India got partitioned, was even worse than a civil war scenario. All in the name of religion. And there indeed was cr...