Skip to main content

Everything at your BACK

Every time you buy any electronic item, you do have extra accessories with it for sure. Same is the case when you buy a camera. A normal day to day life camera usually has a less number of accessories but a camera which has to be used for professional photography has a large number of accessories accompanied with it. A camera backpack should be spacious enough to have all the accessories placed up properly in it so that they can be used up whenever required. The pockets should be spacious so that they can have all accessories placed up properly. Pockets for additional camera, batteries, lenses etc. In case of a camera with a tripod stand camera backpack must be able to carry it up too. The backpack’s material should also be taken care of while going for it. The backpack should be properly cushioned up so that it does not cause any damage to the lenses. Also it should be water resistant so that the camera isn’t affected by the water. A backpack with all these qualities must have good appearance also. A backpack might not be chosen by the customer because it isn’t that appealing. All in all, a backpack should be spacious, all its pockets should be easily accessible, it should be durable, water resistant and appealing. The backpack can also have some space for carrying daily utilities like clothes, toiletries, making it a great travelling bag.

Comments

Anshul Pandey said…
Hey man...the blog is good. you guys at R K Puram have a very good sense of writing. I am going to place a link of your blog on my site. I hope you do so too. Looking forward to becoming good friends. Mail me...
Anshul Pandey
DPS Vijaipur
wepeople.co.nr
emailanshul@aol.com
February 8, 2010 at 7:39 PM
Post a Comment

Also read

Does India need communal parties?

I think, it was Tan's post on this blog itself, Republic Day Event, where this question was raised. My answer. YES. we need communal parties even in Independent, Secular India. Now let me take you, back to events before 1947. When India was a colony of the British Empire. The congress party, in its attempt to gain momentum for the independence movement, heavily used Hinduism, an example of which is the famous Ganesh Utsav held in Mumbai every year. Who complains? No one. But at that time, due to various policies of the congress, Muslims started feeling alienated. Jinnah, in these times, got stubborn over the need of Pakistan and he did find a lot of supporters. Congress, up till late 1940's never got bothered by it. And why should we? Who complains? No one. But there were repercussions. The way people were butchered and slaughtered during that brief time when India got partitioned, was even worse than a civil war scenario. All in the name of religion. And there indeed was cr...
40 comments
Read more

Debate : Do the ends justify the means...

Note : Give it all a fair thought before you jot down... Flaming and religion-bashing will not be tolerated. Your participation is gladly appreciated. I dunno if you folks remember this incident; a couple of yrs back, the UPSC exam had a question where the emainee had to assert his views on *revolutionary terrorism* initiated by Bhagat Singh. As is typical of the government, hue and cry was not far behind... Anyway, let us look at some facts -   Bhagat Singh was an atheist, considered to be one of the earliest Marxist in India and in line with hi thinking, he renamed the Hindustan Republican Party and called it the Hindustan Socialist Revolutionary Party. Bhagat Finally, awaiting his own execution for the murder of Saunders, Bhagat Singh at the young age of 24 studied Marxism thoroughly and wrote a profound pamphlet “Why I am an Atheist.” which is an ideological statement in itself. The circumstances of his death and execution are worth recounting. Although, Bhagat Singh had a...
30 comments
Read more

Inside Congress by Ronald Kessler: power, perks, and peril on Capitol Hill

This critical review of Inside Congress by Ronald Kessler reveals the shocking truth behind Capitol Hill's glitzy surface. Featuring real quotes, scandals, and systemic corruption, this article dissects the book’s revelations with historical, social, and political context. Get ready to question everything you thought you knew about America’s lawmakers. What is ‘Inside Congress’ about? Reading Inside Congress felt like sneaking into a backstage political theatre—only to realise that the actors were drunk, corrupt, and having affairs with the ushers. Ronald Kessler doesn’t just pull the curtain back on Congress—he rips it off, throws it on the floor, and sets it on fire. At its core, the book is a catalogue of misconduct, but it’s more than that. It’s a raw, unnerving look at a system so infected by self-interest and sleaze that the word “democracy” starts to feel like a punchline. The book spans sexual escapades, financial corruption, and outright betrayal of public trust. But th...
Post a Comment
Read more