Skip to main content

Is it time for redemption for Indian Banking System

Indian banking system is a sad story. We have one of the largest concentrations of government dominated banks around the world. India has also a rigid and strict regulatory system for banks. Such is the inscrutably of the regulators that they encourage cheap and bulk loans to large corporates but should such big people try to own banks, it is frowned upon. Customer service is an alien concept to Indian banks, public or private. Convenience to the public is least of their worries as the penetration of formal lending is quite less giving them a God like status.

It is no wonder though that a parallel economy exists in India right under the nose of well-heeled bankers and regulators. They act as enablers to this system, fostering an economic activity that forms most of the financial transactions in the country. Indeed, India being a cash-oriented economy is largely due to indifference and lack sided attitude of banks.

People prefer to keep cash at home than banks even though the government owns more than 25 banks. To go to a bank for a transaction is often a nightmarish task which often involves a lot of paper pushing and frustrating delays. The situations at private sector banks are no good either.

Anyone who has had a chance to look at the NPA statements of banks can see how carelessly they have handled public's money. It's like there is no method or logic to the way credit was extended to the chosen ones. Bad loans are surmounting by each passing quarter even though the economy is growing at a steady space.

Thus, Prime Minister Modi's step to demonetize currency notes of 500 and 1000 rupees is a God sent opportunity for the banks to reform. Ideally, it should have been their job to move the country to a cashless society. But instead of them, it is the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, who are doing all the pushing. From Jan Dhan Yojna to Demonetization, it is all the will of the leadership being executed by the banks. And they have to do that.

After all, the leadership is pumping in hard earned money of the public (around 25,000 crore rupees this year alone) into banks as equity so that banks can keep up their hobby of distributing bad loans, encouraging borrowers to not pay and flush more people money in the toilet. They have already written off thousand of crores which were owed to them by wilful defaulters.They owe the political leadership that much to follow their plans.

But the queues to change currency notes and deposit money in banks could have been much shorter had the banks done a decent job at their own end. Had they promoted digital technology for payments or made people aware about alternative means, people would not have been carrying so much cash anyway.

The huge surge in deposits is, therefore, an opportune moment for banks. They can be reborn into a lean and mean financial institutions dedicated to all segments of society and not just the super rich. This would do well to diversify their client base and make good business sense too.





Comments

Also read

Does India need communal parties?

I think, it was Tan's post on this blog itself, Republic Day Event, where this question was raised. My answer. YES. we need communal parties even in Independent, Secular India. Now let me take you, back to events before 1947. When India was a colony of the British Empire. The congress party, in its attempt to gain momentum for the independence movement, heavily used Hinduism, an example of which is the famous Ganesh Utsav held in Mumbai every year. Who complains? No one. But at that time, due to various policies of the congress, Muslims started feeling alienated. Jinnah, in these times, got stubborn over the need of Pakistan and he did find a lot of supporters. Congress, up till late 1940's never got bothered by it. And why should we? Who complains? No one. But there were repercussions. The way people were butchered and slaughtered during that brief time when India got partitioned, was even worse than a civil war scenario. All in the name of religion. And there indeed was cr...

Adopt what is right.....

I see that many people of my age group adopt certain western cultures. School students and college goers are often seen buying friendship bands and valentine cards. I feel its not right. You may think I am traditional and don't keep up to date views. But if you think a little maturely you will find out its not modern to wear friendship bands. Its rather pure pride. Now as I am talking about western culture I should tell you that I'm not against it in fact I find some of the western values very much followable like dignity of work, civic sense, accountability etc. We have to maturely decide what to adopt from the westerners and what not to adopt. Why should we go after them when we have a culture of such great versatility? -Priya Joyce

Did You Ever Love Me? Book Review: Can Rithvik singh turn heartbreak into a homecoming?

Did You Ever Love Me? by Rithvik Singh is a tender contemporary poetry collection about love, heartbreak, longing, self worth and learning to let go. Its greatest strength is emotional accessibility: Singh writes directly to readers who feel intensely and care deeply. The collection offers comfort without pretending heartbreak is simple, though its simplicity may occasionally feel familiar to seasoned poetry readers. Did you Ever Love Me? Have you ever loved someone so completely that, after they left, you were left wondering whether they had ever understood what they had been given? Not merely whether they loved you, but whether they ever noticed how much you loved them, how much patience you offered, how many small things you remembered, or how often you chose to stay when leaving might have been easier. There is a particular loneliness in that question because it rarely arrives at a dramatic moment. More often, it finds you while you are doing something completely ordinary. Yo...