Skip to main content

#MeToo & the perils of being a working male in India today


In the year 1983, when the Indian lawmakers amended the Indian Penal Code to add section 498a (to deal with matrimonial cruelty) little would they have imagined that it would one of its most misused sections. Over the years, married men and their families were amply harassed by their wives using this section as a weapon. Thousands of false dowry cases are still pending and being filed each other to make men more compliant. In fact, in 2017, even the Supreme Court of India had to take the cognizance of the rise in several false cases under section 498a.


The #Metoo fad reminds of this trend. In today’s time, Indian workplaces are in fact becoming dangerous and unsafe for men than women. Many careers are being destroyed simply because of false cases and accusations going around.

It is more so in office cultures in India because of our own complex social system. Since Independence, women have gained more recognition and space in white collar jobs in India. Still, our society is patriarchal in nature and there are many who believe that women have not been given their due.

That our population is still incapable of gender balance and equality can be recognized from the fact how so many women support sexual assaults and even help cover up gender-related crimes. Its all in the data and so many stories you hear on regular basis.

Our workplaces are in fact reflection of our society. Men will flash their egos and expect women to play a demure role. Why? Because they have grown up in a society where sisters are too compliant and mothers always firm in the background. Many women struggle in their workplaces trying to create a niche with their acquired knowledge. They struggle because they have been brought up in a society which makes them too passive. 

While it’s an achievement, it is also creating an unhealthy working environment. I will give you an example of a girl, let's call her Z. She is quite friendly with her male boss whom we will call X. Now, when X invited her for a drink outside office hours, she agreed. It boosted her image in the office. The perception built up that she is close to the boss. Now when the boss gets little extra friendly with her, let's say starts calling her every night, she gets confused. She hesitates in saying no.  It is cases such as these which later blow to sexual harassment and land on your social media with a #metoo title.

Then there is the spite. Like the false dowry cases, there is a spike in false reporting of sexual misconduct in offices, just for the heck of it. It gets the complainant sympathy, vengeance, control, or whatever emotion she is looking for. The male colleague suffers isolation, demoralization, and setback in a career.

And then there is pure ambition. We know of so many women at workplaces who to further their ambitions are ready to walk that extra mile. And in case things don’t go as planned, there is always an allegation to rely upon.

I am not saying that sexual misconduct in workplaces is an issue to ignore. It’s a huge thing. But there are women in offices who are supporting this. Some by their silence and some by participation. For if X the boss is expecting something out of Z his subordinate, there have been many before her who used X as a step of the ladder of their professional achievements. Look at the film industry, where the whole #metoo thing is getting the most attention. While some might point fingers at a director or producer for their casting couch, there are many who jumped over the chance to further their agenda.

What makes it so toxic is how we all treat such crimes. The #metoo campaign also relies on the same logic. We rely on insinuations rather than a fair probe. Whenever there is a matter of sexual harassment or assault, we are too eager to judge. Hence, you see a social media post with snippets of conversation and everyone taking sides. No one is happy to read the full story. Let us just name and shame. We forget very conveniently that when we do that, by passing judgment on basis of hearsay, we are belittling every claim of sexual misconduct. False or True, the allegation just remains that; an allegation. An incomplete statement, ruining lives of people and just serving fodder to rumor mills.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cutting people off isn’t strength—It is a trauma response

Your ability to cut people off and self-isolate is not a skill you should be proud of—It is a trauma response Cutting people off and self-isolating may feel like a protective shield, but it is often rooted in unresolved or unhealed trauma and an inability to depend on others. While these behaviors seem like self-preservation, they end up reinforcing isolation and blocking meaningful connections. Confronting these patterns, seeking therapy, and nurturing supportive relationships can help break this unhealthy cycle. Plus, a simple act like planting a jasmine plant can symbolise the start of your journey towards emotional healing. Why do we cut people off and isolate? If you’re someone who prides themselves on “cutting people off” or keeping a tight circle, you might believe it’s a skill—a way to protect yourself from betrayal, hurt, or unnecessary drama. I get it. I’ve been there, too. But here’s the thing: this ability to isolate yourself is not as empowering as it may seem. In fact, i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Epitome of Equality

First of all This is not to demean any religion.. I am a Hindu by birth, but yes I respect all religions .I offer my daily prayers , fast on holy days , but there was something that was disturbing me . God as per me was a Friend, someone who was by my side always , someone who was a dear friend , but this is not what everyone else thought , for others he was the Judge who gives his verdict always and punishes anyone and everyone . Walk into any temple and you would see , if you have money , you will be treated in a way as if you are the ONLY disciple of the God . I have had too many experiences where I was treated as a second class citizen in the temple . Why? Well I could not afford giving thousands as donation. This is not how it should be , God looks at each one of us with the same divinity .As I mentioned God for me is a friend, so tell me, do we chose friends based on their bank balances? Do we give our verdict on them ? then how can God do it? I know many of us would ...
32 comments
Read more

Does India need communal parties?

I think, it was Tan's post on this blog itself, Republic Day Event, where this question was raised. My answer. YES. we need communal parties even in Independent, Secular India. Now let me take you, back to events before 1947. When India was a colony of the British Empire. The congress party, in its attempt to gain momentum for the independence movement, heavily used Hinduism, an example of which is the famous Ganesh Utsav held in Mumbai every year. Who complains? No one. But at that time, due to various policies of the congress, Muslims started feeling alienated. Jinnah, in these times, got stubborn over the need of Pakistan and he did find a lot of supporters. Congress, up till late 1940's never got bothered by it. And why should we? Who complains? No one. But there were repercussions. The way people were butchered and slaughtered during that brief time when India got partitioned, was even worse than a civil war scenario. All in the name of religion. And there indeed was cr...
40 comments
Read more