Skip to main content

Becoming rich with mutual funds?

It is virtually impossible to determine with 100% accuracy the full success of investments in
mutual funds, no matter how many people are in the market or not. The main reason is it is a platform where there is no constant, for every one minute, there is a change in the market, which causes rise and fall in the shares, and their investment will be lost and gained.

The funds are present to take care of the money of people who don’t have time or have some or any expertise to invest in stocks. They can give you returns that will

beat inflation most of the times, and you can increase your money by anywhere

between 12% to 24% over 5 to 10 years depending on your timing of the purchase of it.

The above returns surely are not worst. But two problems are most

likely to hit and prevent you from getting super-rich, out of the league they are:

1) Timing of purchase: You are not expected to get the right timing every-time.

Those who bought stocks in 2001 & exited in 2007 end can understand how

critical the timing can be. They made 25% to approximately 35% returns

compounded annually. However, those who invested in 2007 and exited in

2013 pretty much were sitting on the same sum of money in a 6 to 7 year

period. In the long run, the timing is improbable to be perfect for anyone.

So, the returns are not likely to be the ones that the fund managers like to

display with the benefit of hindsight. SIP further averages this out & lowers

the return.

2) Diversified investments: What mutual funds do is that it diversifies your

investment, which saves you from the downside of concentrated investment

in a few lesser stocks or poor selection. However, what it also does is that it

prevents you from the supernormal profits that can be gained by a great

variety of stocks.

3) 3) Mutual Fund regulations: Even if you get perfect timing as said above,

you will not get super-rich like Warren Buffet since mutual funds are highly

regulated by govt. All this is for the safety of the investors since, by design,

the funds are for non-savvy market investors. They would settle for

moderate returns, but can’t take high risks at the cost of losing a substantial

part of their capital. The net result is that most funds have an extensive portfolio of Blue-chip stocks which indeed preserve your particular capital, but also

prevent you from getting super normal returns from hidden jewels or

beaten down but good potential stock.

4) So Mutual Funds would make you earn above the fixed deposits or LIC

plans. However, it won’t make you very rich, like direct investing in stocks

can. This is common sense as well since nobody became rich by letting

other people manage their money.

By taking on a certain level of risk, you can put your current asset or assets to

work for you and generate short-term or long-term income, depending on your

investment goal. It is for this reason that riskier securities, such as

stocks are considered the go-to investments for people looking to

strike it rich.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Epitome of Equality

First of all This is not to demean any religion.. I am a Hindu by birth, but yes I respect all religions .I offer my daily prayers , fast on holy days , but there was something that was disturbing me . God as per me was a Friend, someone who was by my side always , someone who was a dear friend , but this is not what everyone else thought , for others he was the Judge who gives his verdict always and punishes anyone and everyone . Walk into any temple and you would see , if you have money , you will be treated in a way as if you are the ONLY disciple of the God . I have had too many experiences where I was treated as a second class citizen in the temple . Why? Well I could not afford giving thousands as donation. This is not how it should be , God looks at each one of us with the same divinity .As I mentioned God for me is a friend, so tell me, do we chose friends based on their bank balances? Do we give our verdict on them ? then how can God do it? I know many of us would ...

"My cousin touched me there"

Note: When Tan suggested me to post this here...I gave it a thought. I felt he was right.  yeha I know in the election times ..people would be more inclined to politics. Well still..just give it a read :) For the first time when she came in I knew she is going to be one of my best pals. she was bubbly chirpy sociable and a caring human being.she was I felt my true copy. But what I felt wasn't true and I'd never known that trait of hers which never matched mine had such a reason behind it. She never liked to talk or be familiar to the opposite sex. I found this irritating but I just used to remember all her other traits which brought her close to me and made her one of the closest beings to me on this Earth. As she and I had got very close in friendship that we began sharing secrets which we never thought would come out of our mind. And I thought I understood her as I thought she was me. Then one day as we were alone in my room I asked her why she was so unfamiliar and irritat...

Does India need communal parties?

I think, it was Tan's post on this blog itself, Republic Day Event, where this question was raised. My answer. YES. we need communal parties even in Independent, Secular India. Now let me take you, back to events before 1947. When India was a colony of the British Empire. The congress party, in its attempt to gain momentum for the independence movement, heavily used Hinduism, an example of which is the famous Ganesh Utsav held in Mumbai every year. Who complains? No one. But at that time, due to various policies of the congress, Muslims started feeling alienated. Jinnah, in these times, got stubborn over the need of Pakistan and he did find a lot of supporters. Congress, up till late 1940's never got bothered by it. And why should we? Who complains? No one. But there were repercussions. The way people were butchered and slaughtered during that brief time when India got partitioned, was even worse than a civil war scenario. All in the name of religion. And there indeed was cr...